Khalid Akram

How Evidence is used in Theft and Fraud Cases in Calgary

Khalid Akram · August 25, 2024 ·

Types of Evidence Commonly Used in Theft and Fraud Cases

Physical Evidence

In theft cases, physical evidence plays a critical role in linking an accused individual to the crime. This type of evidence includes any tangible items that can be presented in court, such as stolen property recovered by law enforcement or tools used in committing the crime. For instance, if a burglary has occurred, items like lock-picking tools or even surveillance footage capturing the suspect at the scene can serve as compelling evidence. In Calgary, theft charges often depend heavily on the ability of prosecutors to produce and verify physical evidence, underscoring its importance in securing a conviction.

Documentary Evidence

In the realm of fraud, documentary evidence becomes paramount. This encompasses a wide array of documents such as contracts, financial records, bank statements, and any paperwork that can demonstrate discrepancies or fraudulent transactions. Calgary theft and fraud lawyers specializing in theft and fraud charges emphasize the significance of how documents are handled and presented in court. Electronic records are increasingly becoming a focal point in fraud cases. Emails, transaction histories, and digital data trails are scrutinized for signs of misconduct. The integrity and authenticity of these electronic documents can often make or break a fraud case, as they provide a detailed insight into the financial behaviors and patterns that could indicate fraudulent activities.

Witness Testimony

Witness testimony is another cornerstone of legal proceedings in theft and fraud cases. Witness statements can either support or weaken the claims made by the defense or prosecution. In theft cases, eyewitnesses who observed the crime occur or who can identify the accused are invaluable.

How Evidence is Collected and Preserved

Investigation Process

The process of collecting evidence in theft and fraud cases begins with a thorough investigation conducted by law enforcement. In Calgary, this often involves both the Calgary Police Service and specialized units that handle financial crimes, depending on the complexity of the case.

Chain of Custody

This refers to the chronological documentation or paper trail that records the sequence of custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of physical and electronic evidence. Proper handling and documentation prevent any potential tampering, loss, or contamination of evidence, which could otherwise compromise the case. Calgary lawyers specializing in theft and fraud charges often scrutinize the chain of custody during trials to confirm that evidence has been managed correctly, thereby upholding its integrity and admissibility in court.

Digital Evidence

As technology evolves, so does the nature of evidence. Surveillance footage, which can be pivotal in both theft and fraud cases, is also handled with strict protocols to ensure it reflects an unaltered and accurate account of events, thus serving as reliable evidence in court.

The Role of Evidence in Building a Case

Prosecution’s Use of Evidence

In Calgary, the prosecution’s ability to build a compelling case against someone accused of theft or fraud heavily relies on the effective use of evidence. Prosecutors meticulously gather and present various forms of evidence, including physical, documentary, and digital, to establish a clear link between the accused and the criminal activity. They aim to construct a narrative that leaves little doubt about the guilt of the defendant by corroborating different pieces of evidence to reinforce their argument. For instance, in a fraud case, the prosecution would use financial records and expert testimony to demonstrate how the accused manipulated information for personal gain. The strength of the evidence presented is crucial as it directly influences the likelihood of securing a conviction.

Defense Strategies for Challenging Evidence

Defense lawyers in Calgary specializing in theft and fraud charges employ various strategies to challenge the prosecution’s evidence, aiming to create reasonable doubt about the guilt of the accused. One common approach is to question the integrity of the evidence collection process, including potential breaches in the chain of custody or flaws in how digital evidence was secured.

Key Challenges in Presenting Evidence

Admissibility of Evidence

Criteria for Admissibility: In Calgary, as in the rest of Canada, evidence must meet certain criteria to be considered admissible in court. These include relevance to the case, reliability, and the evidence being more probative than prejudicial. Additionally, the evidence must have been obtained legally, respecting the rights guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Challenges with Admissibility: The challenge lies in demonstrating that evidence meets these criteria, especially in complex theft and fraud cases where the evidence often involves detailed financial records or electronic data. A Calgary theft and fraud charges lawyer must expertly navigate these complexities, ensuring that all presented evidence is robust enough to withstand legal scrutiny and contribute effectively to the client’s defense.

Hearsay and Its Limitations

Understanding Hearsay: Hearsay is any statement made outside of the courtroom that is presented for the truth of its contents, rather than for other purposes like illustrating a speaker’s state of mind. Hearsay is generally inadmissible because it does not allow for cross-examination, and its reliability cannot be adequately assessed by the court.

Hearsay in Theft and Fraud Cases: In theft and fraud cases, hearsay evidence might include written or electronic statements implicating someone in fraudulent activities. However, there are exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as business records or statements made during the commission of the crime, which can be admissible under certain circumstances.

Navigating Hearsay Rules: A proficient Calgary theft and fraud charges lawyer needs to understand these exceptions deeply and how to argue for or against the admissibility of hearsay based on its context and necessity in proving or disproving elements of the case.

Relevance and Prejudice

Balancing Act: The evidence presented in court must be relevant, meaning it should directly relate to the case and have the ability to influence the outcome. However, the challenge is ensuring that this evidence does not unfairly prejudice the jury, leading them to make decisions based on emotion rather than facts.

Managing Prejudicial Evidence: In theft and fraud cases, evidence that could be seen as prejudicial includes overly graphic descriptions of the alleged crime’s impact on victims or presenting financial data in a way that might inflame the jury’s perceptions without adding substantive value to the legal arguments.

Role of the Lawyer: It is the responsibility of a Calgary theft and fraud charges lawyer to strike this delicate balance, advocating for the inclusion of crucial evidence while also protecting the rights of their client from potentially prejudicial material.

Understanding the Impaired Driving Legal Process in Calgary

Khalid Akram · August 22, 2024 ·

What Constitutes Impaired Driving in Calgary?

Legal Definition of Impaired Driving

In Calgary, the legal definition of impaired driving extends beyond simply having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) above the legal limit of 0.08 percent. It encompasses any instance where a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle is compromised due to the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both.

Explanation of Impaired Driving under Calgary’s Laws

Impaired driving in Calgary is primarily detected through roadside sobriety tests, breathalyzers, and blood tests. These tests determine whether a driver’s physical or cognitive functions are impaired while operating a vehicle. It’s important to note that even if a driver’s BAC is below 0.08 percent, they can still be charged with impaired driving if their ability to drive is deemed unsafe by law enforcement based on observed behaviors or evidence of impairment.

Distinction between Alcohol-Impaired and Drug-Impaired Driving

While both alcohol-impaired and drug-impaired driving are treated as serious offenses, there are notable distinctions in how they are identified and prosecuted:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving: This form of impaired driving is typically identified through the use of a breathalyzer test, which measures the amount of alcohol in one’s breath. Drivers who test at or above the legal BAC limit are subject to immediate penalties, including license suspension and possible vehicle impoundment.
Drug-Impaired Driving: Identifying drug impairment can be more complex than alcohol detection. It often involves evaluations by Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) who are trained to recognize signs of drug use. Tests might include field sobriety tests, saliva tests, and in some cases, blood tests.

Immediate Consequences of an Impaired Driving Charge

Administrative Penalties

When charged with impaired driving in Calgary, the immediate repercussions begin with administrative penalties that are enforced even before a court date is set.

Overview of Immediate Penalties

One of the first administrative actions taken following an impaired driving charge is the suspension of the driver’s license. This suspension can occur on the spot, depending on the results of a breathalyzer test or the assessment of a law enforcement officer. In cases where the BAC is found to be over the legal limit, or if the driver refuses to comply with a breath test, the license can be suspended immediately for a significant period.

Alberta’s Immediate Roadside Sanctions (IRS) Program

The Immediate Roadside Sanctions (IRS) program in Alberta is a critical component of the province’s approach to handling impaired driving. This program allows law enforcement officers to issue immediate and substantial penalties at the roadside to drivers who fail or refuse to provide a breath sample, or who are caught driving with a BAC exceeding the legal limit.

Key features of the IRS program include:

Immediate License Suspension: Drivers face an immediate license suspension which can last from several months to over a year, depending on the severity of the offense and any previous history of impaired driving.
Mandatory Education or Treatment Programs: Depending on the circumstances, individuals may be required to participate in educational or treatment programs focusing on substance abuse and safe driving practices.
Monetary Fines and Fees: Significant fines and fees are imposed, which can escalate with subsequent offenses.

The Legal Process after Being Charged

Step 1: Arrest and Initial Court Appearance

What Happens During an Arrest for Impaired Driving

When an individual is arrested for impaired driving in Calgary, they will typically undergo a series of procedural steps beginning with the arrest itself, which involves being taken into custody based on evidence of impairment. Following the arrest, the individual is usually taken to a police station for further testing, booking, and formal charging.

The Process of an Initial Court Appearance in Calgary

After an arrest, the accused will face an initial court appearance, or a bail hearing, depending on the severity of the charge. This appearance is crucial as it sets the tone for legal proceedings. It is during this time that the court will outline the charges, and the accused will have an opportunity to apply for bail. This stage is often the first opportunity for the accused’s lawyer to interact with the judicial system on their behalf.

Step 2: Disclosure of Evidence

What Evidence Will Be Provided to the Defense

The prosecution is required to provide the defense with all relevant evidence in the case, which may include police reports, witness statements, results of breathalyzer tests, and video footage from the arrest. This disclosure allows the defense to fully understand the case against them and prepare an appropriate defense strategy.

Importance of Reviewing Evidence with a Calgary Impaired Driving Lawyer

Reviewing the evidence with a knowledgeable Calgary impaired driving lawyer is vital. The lawyer can identify weaknesses or procedural errors in the prosecution’s case, such as issues with how evidence was collected or potential breaches of rights during the arrest.

Step 3: Pre-Trial Motions and Hearings

Potential Pre-Trial Motions That May Be Filed

Pre-trial motions can address a variety of legal issues, including the admissibility of evidence, the possibility of suppressing certain information, and other procedural matters.

Importance of These Hearings in Shaping the Trial Strategy

The outcomes of these hearings may determine the scope of the trial or even result in a dismissal of charges if significant procedural errors are uncovered. This phase is crucial for shaping the defense strategy and potentially negotiating plea deals.

Step 4: The Trial Process

Overview of the Trial Process

The trial process for impaired driving in Calgary may include jury selection (if a jury trial is opted for), opening statements by both the prosecution and defense, the examination and cross-examination of witnesses, presentation of evidence, and closing arguments.

Role of a Calgary Impaired Driving Lawyer During the Trial

A Calgary lawyer plays an essential role in defending the accused during the trial. They are responsible for challenging the prosecution’s evidence, presenting alternative interpretations of the facts, and advocating on behalf of the client to achieve the best possible outcome, whether that is a reduction of charges, acquittal, or a lighter sentence.

Potential Defenses against Impaired Driving Charges

Challenging the Evidence

One effective defense strategy is to challenge the reliability and accuracy of the breathalyzer tests. Factors such as improper calibration, operator errors, or even the individual’s medical conditions can affect the results. Additionally, the legality of the initial traffic stop can be contested. If it can be demonstrated that there was no reasonable cause for the stop, any evidence gathered as a result could be deemed inadmissible in court.

Legal Defenses

Several legal defenses can be applicable in cases of impaired driving, including:

Necessity: This defense might apply if the driver was compelled to operate the vehicle under circumstances that would justify the illegal action. For example, driving under the influence might be considered necessary if it was done to avoid a greater harm, such as escaping from a serious threat.
Duress: Duress involves situations where the defendant was coerced into driving while impaired, possibly under threat of violence or serious harm. Proving duress requires demonstrating that the individual had a well-founded fear of imminent danger and no other viable alternatives.
Involuntary Intoxication: If the defendant was unknowingly intoxicated, perhaps through spiked drinks or mistaken consumption of substances, they might claim involuntary intoxication. This defense argues that the accused did not have the intent to drive impaired as they were unaware of their intoxicated state.

Consequences of a Conviction

Criminal Penalties

Possible Penalties Upon Conviction, Including Fines, Jail Time, and a Criminal Record

Upon conviction for impaired driving, the penalties can be stringent. These may include:

Fines: Financial penalties for impaired driving can be substantial, designed to serve as a deterrent against future offenses.
Jail Time: Depending on the severity of the offense and whether it is a first or subsequent offense, jail time could range from a few days to several years.
Criminal Record: A conviction results in a criminal record, which can have lifelong ramifications, affecting various aspects of one’s life and livelihood.

Impact on Driving Privileges and Insurance Rates

A conviction typically leads to a suspension or revocation of driving privileges, which can vary in length depending on the specifics of the case and previous driving history. Additionally, insurance rates are likely to increase significantly, as insurers will view an individual with an impaired driving conviction as a high-risk driver.

Long-Term Consequences

The long-term consequences of an impaired driving conviction extend beyond legal penalties and financial costs:

Employment: Certain professions, particularly those involving driving or high levels of responsibility, may be closed to individuals with a criminal record. Moreover, current employment could be jeopardized if the job requires a clean driving record.
Travel: Travel restrictions can also arise, as some countries, including the United States, may deny entry to individuals with a criminal record, especially for offenses related to impaired driving.
Personal Reputation: The social stigma associated with a criminal conviction can lead to lost personal and professional relationships, affecting social standing and community ties.

Top Defense Strategies Used by Calgary Drug Charge Lawyers

Khalid Akram · August 19, 2024 ·

Common Types of Drug Charges in Calgary

Types of Drug Offenses

In Calgary, individuals facing drug charges encounter various types of offenses, each carrying significant legal repercussions. The most common drug charges include possession, trafficking, distribution, and manufacturing. Here’s a breakdown of these offenses:

Possession: This charge involves having one or more illegal substances in one’s personal custody or control. Simple possession can escalate to more severe charges depending on the drug’s schedule and the possessed quantity.
Trafficking: Trafficking is not limited to selling drugs; it also includes administering, giving, transferring, transporting, or sending drugs. It’s one of the most serious drug offenses, often resulting in severe penalties.
Distribution: Similar to trafficking but typically involves a broader network and the movement of larger quantities of drugs. Distribution charges can lead to significant legal consequences, especially when crossing provincial or national boundaries.
Manufacturing: Involves producing illegal drugs. This charge also encompasses cultivation, such as growing marijuana plants, and is heavily penalized under Canadian law.

The type and quantity of drugs involved play a crucial role in determining the severity of the charges. For instance, charges involving Schedule I drugs (like heroin or cocaine) are generally more severe than those involving Schedule III drugs (such as steroids).

Consequences of Drug Charges

The penalties for drug offenses in Calgary can be severe, impacting not only the legal standing of an individual but also their personal and professional life. Here are some of the potential consequences:

Imprisonment: Depending on the severity of the offense, sentences can range from several months to multiple years in federal prison.
Fines: Penalties can also include hefty fines, which vary based on the drug type, amount, and the offense’s nature.
Criminal Record: Having a criminal record can severely impact future opportunities, restricting travel possibilities, job prospects, and even housing options.

Defense Strategy 1: Challenging the Legality of the Search and Seizure

Understanding Search and Seizure Laws

In Calgary, the legal standards for search and seizure are primarily guided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which aims to protect individuals from unreasonable search and seizure. The law stipulates that law enforcement must have either a valid warrant or a strong probable cause to conduct a search legally.

Unlawful Search and Seizure Defense

One of the primary defense strategies used by Calgary drug charge lawyers is challenging the legality of the search and seizure that led to the discovery of drugs. Here’s how this defense typically unfolds:

Examining the Search Warrant: A lawyer will scrutinize the warrant to ensure it was issued on sufficient grounds and that the search was conducted as specified in the warrant. Any deviations or inadequacies can be grounds for challenging the search’s legality.
Assessing the Probable Cause: In cases where no warrant was used, the attorney will evaluate whether the police had a legitimate probable cause to conduct a search. Absence of probable cause can render the search illegal and any evidence obtained, inadmissible.
Motion to Suppress Evidence: If a search is deemed unlawful, the lawyer can file a motion to suppress any evidence obtained during that search. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case, as they will be unable to use the key pieces of evidence obtained through the illegal search.

Defense Strategy 2: Questioning the Validity of the Evidence

Chain of Custody Issues

One critical aspect that Calgary drug charge lawyers focus on is the chain of custody of the evidence. The chain of custody refers to the documented and unbroken transfer of evidence from the moment it is collected until it is presented in court.

Importance of Maintaining a Proper Chain of Custody for Drug Evidence

Ensuring a proper chain of custody is fundamental in criminal proceedings, especially in drug-related cases. It provides a clear trail that lawyers, judges, and juries can follow to determine if the evidence has been handled correctly and remains untampered. If the chain is broken or unclear, it can cast doubt on whether the evidence presented is the same as what was initially seized, or if it has been contaminated or altered in any way.

How a Lawyer Can Challenge Evidence

Calgary drug charge lawyers meticulously review the chain of custody records. If discrepancies or lapses in the documentation are found, they can argue that the evidence might have been tampered with or mishandled.

Forensic Testing Errors

Another cornerstone of challenging the validity of drug charge evidence lies in the forensic testing process. The accuracy of the forensic tests that identify and quantify illegal substances is paramount.

Potential Errors in Drug Testing Procedures

Errors in drug testing can occur due to a variety of factors, such as cross-contamination, incorrect labeling, faulty equipment, or human error during the handling and analysis stages. These errors can lead to incorrect identification or quantification of the substances alleged to be illegal drugs.

How Discrepancies in Lab Results Can Be Used

If there are any inconsistencies or anomalies in the lab results, a skilled Calgary drug charge lawyer can use these issues to challenge the reliability of the forensic evidence. This could involve bringing expert witnesses to testify about the potential for error in the testing procedures or directly questioning the lab technicians involved.

Defense Strategy 3: Proving Lack of Knowledge or Intent

Lack of Knowledge Defense

One of the fundamental principles in criminal law is that guilt must involve not only committing an act but doing so with intent or knowledge. In the context of drug charges in Calgary, asserting a lack of knowledge about the presence of drugs can be a powerful defense.

How a Defense Can Argue That the Accused Was Unaware of the Drugs’ Presence

Calgary drug charge lawyers may employ the lack of knowledge defense to demonstrate that the accused had no awareness of the drugs being in their possession or within their premises. This could involve situations where drugs were found in a shared vehicle or home, suggesting that someone else might have placed them there without the accused’s knowledge. Demonstrating this lack of awareness can challenge the prosecution’s assertion that the accused knowingly possessed the drugs.

Intent to Possess or Distribute

In cases of trafficking or distribution, proving the accused’s intent—or rather, the lack thereof—is crucial. The distinction here lies in whether the individual intended to distribute the drugs or was merely in possession without any intent to further distribute them.

How Proving a Lack of Intent Can Be a Key Defense Strategy, Especially in Trafficking Cases

A Calgary drug charge lawyer might argue that the accused did not have the intent to distribute the drugs, which can significantly alter the severity of the charges and penalties. For instance, if someone was found with a large quantity of drugs, the assumption might be that these were intended for distribution. However, if the defense can establish that there was no intent to sell or distribute—perhaps the drugs were for personal use or the accused was unaware of the quantity—the nature of the offense could be viewed less harshly by the court.

Defense Strategy 4: Entrapment

What is Entrapment?

In the realm of drug charges in Calgary, entrapment can take various forms, such as an undercover officer pressuring someone into selling drugs or providing materials for drug production that they would not have sought out on their own.

Definition and Explanation of Entrapment in the Context of Drug Charges

Entrapment is a complex legal concept that hinges on proving that the initiative for the criminal act originated with the police rather than the accused. This defense is particularly relevant in cases where undercover operations are involved. To establish entrapment, the defense must demonstrate that the accused was not predisposed to commit the crime and only did so due to the law enforcement’s persuasion, coercion, or other overbearing tactics.

How a Calgary Drug Charge Lawyer Can Argue Entrapment

A Calgary drug charge lawyer might use the entrapment defense by illustrating how the accused was induced by police to engage in criminal activity that they would not have otherwise engaged in.

The lawyer must effectively argue that without the government’s intervention, the accused would not have committed the crime, thereby shifting focus from the act itself to the conduct of the police.

Defense Strategy 5: Challenging the Credibility of Witnesses

Cross-Examination of Witnesses

In criminal trials, particularly those involving drug charges, the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses is a critical element of the defense. This process involves a Calgary drug charge lawyer scrutinizing the testimonies of the witnesses brought forward by the prosecution to uncover any inconsistencies or discrepancies that may exist in their accounts.

Questioning Informants and Undercover Officers

Informants and undercover officers often play a pivotal role in drug charge cases, especially those involving trafficking and distribution allegations. However, these witnesses can have complicated motives, which might influence their testimony.

Discussing Potential Biases or Motivations of Informants and How This Can Be Used to Undermine Their Credibility

A Calgary drug charge lawyer will scrutinize the backgrounds and motivations of informants and undercover officers to expose any reasons they might have to fabricate or exaggerate their accounts. This might include incentives such as leniency in their own criminal cases, financial compensation, or personal grudges against the accused.

Defense Strategy 6: Plea Bargaining

Negotiating a Plea Deal

Plea bargaining is a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system, particularly in drug charge cases in Calgary. This process involves negotiating with prosecutors to reach an agreement.

How Plea Bargaining Can Be Used to Reduce Charges or Penalties

A skilled Calgary lawyer can leverage plea bargaining as a strategic tool to mitigate the potential consequences of a drug charge conviction. This might involve negotiating terms that could significantly reduce the severity of the charges or the associated penalties. For instance, reducing a trafficking charge to possession, which carries lighter penalties, or agreeing to a plea that avoids jail time in exchange for probation or treatment programs.

When Plea Bargaining is the Best Option

There are several scenarios where accepting a plea deal may be more beneficial than pursuing a trial:

Strong Evidence: If the evidence against the accused is overwhelming, a plea deal might offer a more certain and lenient outcome compared to the risks of a harsher sentence post-trial.
Avoiding Publicity: For individuals concerned about the public and personal implications of a drug trial, a plea deal can resolve the matter more discreetly and quickly.
Legal Costs: Trials can be expensive. When legal fees and the potential for lost income are considered, a plea deal might be a more economically viable option.
Risk Management: Plea bargains provide a certain outcome. Going to trial carries the risk of unpredictable jury decisions and potentially severe penalties.

Understanding and Navigating Youth Criminal Law

Khalid Akram · February 8, 2024 ·

In Canada, the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) sets out specific provisions and procedures for dealing with youth in conflict with the law. It plays a crucial role in addressing the unique needs and circumstances of young persons. A “young person” refers to someone who is between the ages of 12 and 17 at the time of committing an offense.

Foundations of the Youth Justice System:

The system is based on the belief that young persons possess different levels of maturity and culpability compared to adults. Recognizing the developmental stages of young persons, the system aims to hold young offenders accountable for their actions while providing opportunities for rehabilitation and positive growth.

Key Principles of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA):

Rehabilitation and Reintegration: The primary objective of the YCJA is to rehabilitate young offenders and facilitate their successful reintegration into society. This emphasis on rehabilitation emphasizes the importance of addressing underlying factors contributing to delinquent behavior.
Proportionality: The YCJA mandates that youth sentences must be proportionate to the severity of the offense and the individual circumstances of the offender. Sentencing decisions aim to balance accountability with the principles of restraint.
Youthfulness as a Mitigating Factor: The law recognizes that the immaturity and vulnerability of young offenders may mitigate their level of responsibility for criminal behavior. Courts take into account factors such as age, maturity, and the potential for rehabilitation when determining appropriate responses to youth offenses.
Protection of Rights: The YCJA upholds the legal rights of young persons, including the right to legal representation, the right to a fair trial, and the right to privacy. These safeguards ensure that young offenders are treated fairly and afforded due process throughout the justice process.

Key Components of the Juvenile Justice Process:

Extrajudicial Measures: For less serious offenses, police officers and youth justice officials may opt for extrajudicial measures such as warnings, cautions, or referrals to community programs. These measures aim to address underlying issues without resorting to formal court proceedings.
Diversion Programs: Diversion programs provide alternative interventions for youth offenders, including community service, counseling, or educational programs. These initiatives focus on addressing the root causes of delinquency and promoting positive behavioral change.
Youth Court Proceedings: In cases where formal charges are laid, youth offenders may appear before the youth court, which operates separately from adult criminal court. Youth court proceedings prioritize the principles of rehabilitation and reintegration while ensuring accountability for criminal behavior.
Sentencing and Dispositions: If found guilty, youth offenders may receive various dispositions, including probation, community service, or custody sentences.

If you’ve been charged as a young offender, contact our experienced team today for a free consultation. With our understanding of the principles and processes of youth criminal law, and our experience navigating the complexities of the youth justice system, we take a wholistic and collaborative approach to resolving youth criminal charges.