Khalid Akram

What Happens After a Sexual Assault Allegation Is Reported?

Khalid Akram · April 9, 2026 ·

Key Takeaways

A reported allegation leads to a police investigation, which may begin immediately or after a delay.
Police gather evidence through statements, interviews, and digital records.
Charges can be laid based on credibility, even without physical evidence.
The accused may be arrested, released, or required to attend court.
Early guidance from a sexual assault lawyer is essential to protect your rights.

Initial Report and Police Response

The process begins when an allegation is reported to police. This can happen in person, online, or through a third party. In Calgary, police treat these complaints seriously, regardless of when the incident is said to have occurred.

Officers will first take a detailed statement from the complainant. This statement forms the foundation of the investigation. Police may also assess whether there is any immediate risk to public safety.

Not all allegations are reported right away. Delayed reporting is common in these cases. Even if the alleged incident occurred months or years earlier, police can still proceed with an investigation.

The Police Investigation Process

Once a complaint is filed, police begin gathering evidence. The goal is to determine whether there are reasonable grounds to lay charges.

Investigators typically:

Conduct detailed interviews with the complainant
Identify and interview potential witnesses
Collect any available physical or forensic evidence
Review digital communications, including texts, emails, and social media

Consistency plays a key role. Investigators will compare statements and evidence to identify discrepancies. Even small inconsistencies can affect how the case develops.

In many cases, digital evidence becomes central. Messages or timelines may support or contradict the allegations. This makes early legal review especially important.

When and How Police Contact the Accused

After gathering initial evidence, police may contact the accused. This can happen in different ways depending on the circumstances.

In some cases, officers request a voluntary interview. While this may seem informal, it is still part of the investigation. Anything said can be used as evidence.

In other situations, police may proceed directly to arrest. This usually occurs when they believe there are sufficient grounds or concerns about safety.

You have the right to remain silent. Speaking to police without legal advice can create risks. Consulting a sexual assault lawyer before any interaction is a critical step.

Arrest, Detention, or Release Conditions

If police decide to arrest, the accused may be taken into custody. The next step is determining whether the individual will be released or held for a bail hearing.

Many individuals are released with conditions. These may include:

No contact orders with the complainant
Restrictions on attending certain locations
Limits on communication or internet use

In more serious cases, a bail hearing may be required. The court will decide whether detention is necessary based on factors such as public safety and the risk of not attending court.

Strict compliance with release conditions is essential. Violating them can lead to additional charges.

How Charges Are Laid in Sexual Assault Cases

In Alberta, police can lay charges if they believe there are reasonable grounds. The Crown prosecutor then reviews the case and determines how it will proceed.

It is important to understand that physical evidence is not always required. Charges can be based on the complainant’s account if it is considered credible.

Sexual assault charges fall under the Criminal Code of Canada. The specific charge depends on the nature of the allegation and the surrounding circumstances.

Once charges are laid, the case moves into the court system. At this stage, legal strategy becomes critical.

First Court Appearance and Early Proceedings

After charges are laid, the accused will receive a court date. The first appearance is typically administrative. It allows the court to confirm representation and set timelines.

One of the most important steps at this stage is disclosure. The Crown must provide all relevant evidence to the defence. This may include:

Police notes
Witness statements
Digital and forensic evidence

A sexual assault lawyer will review this material carefully. Early analysis helps identify weaknesses and shape the defence strategy.

The Role of Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases

Evidence is central to how these cases are decided. Unlike some offences, sexual assault cases often rely heavily on testimony and credibility.

Common types of evidence include:

Statements from the complainant and witnesses
Digital communications
Medical or forensic reports

In many cases, there are no independent witnesses. This means the court must assess credibility carefully. Consistency, detail, and reliability all play a role.

Conflicting evidence can create reasonable doubt. A well-prepared defence will focus on identifying and presenting these inconsistencies.

Defence Strategies After an Allegation

A strong defence begins with a detailed review of all evidence. The goal is to identify weaknesses in the Crown’s case.

Key defence strategies may include:

Challenging inconsistencies in statements
Questioning the reliability of evidence
Highlighting gaps in the investigation
Demonstrating alternative explanations

An experienced sexual assault lawyer will also assess whether proper procedures were followed. If not, certain evidence may be excluded.

Each case is unique. Effective defence requires a tailored approach based on the specific facts and evidence.

Charter Rights and Legal Protections

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides important protections for individuals accused of a crime.

These include:

The right to remain silent
The right to speak with a lawyer
Protection against unlawful search and seizure

If police violate these rights, the defence may apply to exclude evidence. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

Understanding and asserting these rights early is essential. Legal guidance ensures they are properly protected throughout the process.

Practical Steps to Take If You Are Accused

If you are facing a sexual assault allegation, your actions can affect the outcome. Taking the right steps early is critical.

You should:

Avoid any contact with the complainant
Do not discuss the case with friends, family, or online
Preserve all relevant communications and records
Follow all court or release conditions carefully
Speak with a sexual assault lawyer as soon as possible

Mistakes made early can be difficult to correct later. Careful, informed decisions are essential.

Why Early Legal Representation Matters

Timing matters in these cases. Early involvement of a sexual assault lawyer can influence how the case develops.

A lawyer can:

Guide you through police interactions
Prevent damaging statements
Begin reviewing evidence immediately
Develop a defence strategy from the outset

Early legal advice helps protect your rights and positions you for a stronger defence.

FAQs About Sexual Assault Allegations in Calgary

Can charges be laid without physical evidence?

Yes. Many cases proceed based on testimony and credibility rather than physical evidence.

Should I speak to police if contacted?

It is generally best to consult a lawyer before speaking. Anything you say can be used as evidence.

What happens if the complainant withdraws the allegation?

The Crown may still proceed if there is enough evidence to support the case.

How long does a sexual assault case take in Calgary?

Timelines vary. Some cases resolve quickly, while others take months or longer depending on complexity.

Can I be released after arrest for sexual assault?

Yes. Many individuals are released with conditions unless the court determines detention is necessary.

How Police Observation Notes Impact DUI Defence

Khalid Akram · April 5, 2026 ·

Key Takeaways

Police observation notes are critical evidence in DUI cases and often support the entire prosecution.
These notes document driving behaviour, physical symptoms, and roadside interactions.
Errors, inconsistencies, or missing details can weaken DUI charges.
An experienced impaired driving lawyer can challenge the reliability of these notes.
Strong legal analysis may lead to evidence exclusion, reduced charges, or acquittal.

What Are Police Observation Notes in DUI Cases?

In any DUI defence, police observation notes are a central piece of evidence. These notes are written by the officer during or shortly after a traffic stop and arrest.

They typically include detailed observations from multiple stages of the investigation. This begins with the initial stop and continues through roadside testing and processing at the station.

Common details recorded include:

Driving patterns such as weaving or sudden braking
Physical signs like slurred speech, red eyes, or the odour of alcohol
Statements made by the driver
Performance during roadside sobriety tests

Courts often treat these notes as contemporaneous evidence, meaning they were recorded close in time to the event. Because of this, they are given significant weight unless challenged effectively.

Why Police Notes Matter in DUI Charges

Police notes are not just background information. They are used to justify every major step in a DUI investigation.

For example, officers must establish reasonable suspicion to demand roadside testing. They must then form reasonable grounds to proceed with an arrest or breath demand. These legal thresholds are often supported almost entirely by what is written in the notes.

Prosecutors rely on these notes to:

Justify the legality of the traffic stop
Support the demand for a breath sample
Explain why the driver was arrested

In many cases, the notes also help reinforce breathalyzer evidence. If the notes are weak or inconsistent, the reliability of the entire case may be questioned.

Common Issues Found in Police Observation Notes

Even though police notes are important, they are not always accurate or complete. Identifying weaknesses in these notes is a key part of any effective DUI defence.

Some common issues include:

Inconsistencies between notes and courtroom testimony
Missing details about key observations
Vague descriptions such as “appeared impaired” without explanation
Unclear timelines that affect the sequence of events
Repetitive or templated wording used across multiple cases

Another critical issue arises when notes conflict with objective evidence. For example, dashcam or bodycam footage may contradict what the officer recorded. When this happens, the credibility of the officer can be challenged directly.

How a DUI Lawyer Analyzes Police Notes

A skilled DUI lawyer does not simply read police notes they dissect them. Every line is reviewed for legal and factual weaknesses that can be used in court.

This process includes:

Comparing notes with video evidence and audio recordings
Reviewing breathalyzer logs and timing records
Identifying contradictions or missing steps in procedure
Assessing whether the officer followed proper legal standards

An experienced impaired driving lawyer also looks for potential Charter violations. If the notes reveal unlawful detention, improper questioning, or delays in providing access to counsel, the defence may seek to exclude key evidence.

Challenging Police Notes in Court

Police notes are not automatically accepted as accurate. They must withstand scrutiny in court, especially during cross-examination.

A DUI lawyer may challenge these notes by:

Highlighting inconsistencies between notes and testimony
Questioning the officer’s memory and accuracy
Demonstrating gaps in the investigation
Using external evidence to contradict observations

If the court finds the notes unreliable, the consequences can be significant. Evidence may be excluded, which weakens the Crown’s case. In some situations, this can result in reduced charges or a full dismissal.

The Role of Police Notes in Establishing Impairment

To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove impairment beyond a reasonable doubt. Police notes are often used to support this claim.

These notes typically describe subjective observations, such as behaviour or appearance. However, subjective observations alone are not always sufficient. Courts prefer to see these supported by objective evidence, such as breath test results.

A strong DUI defence will question whether the observations truly indicate impairment. For example, fatigue, stress, or medical conditions can mimic signs of intoxication. Without clear and consistent documentation, the reliability of these observations becomes questionable.

Charter Rights and Police Note Deficiencies

In Canada, Charter rights play a critical role in DUI cases. Police notes can reveal whether these rights were respected during the investigation.

Key areas include:

Section 8: Protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Section 9: Protection against arbitrary detention
Section 10(b): Right to speak with counsel

If police notes show gaps or inconsistencies in how these rights were handled, it may support a legal challenge. Courts can exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Charter, which can significantly impact the case.

Practical Steps to Take If You Are Facing DUI Charges

If you are dealing with DUI charges, taking the right steps early can make a meaningful difference in your defence.

You should:

Avoid making assumptions about the strength of the case
Request full disclosure, including all police notes
Refrain from making statements that could be used against you
Preserve any evidence that supports your version of events
Speak with an experienced impaired driving lawyer as soon as possible

Early legal guidance allows for a more thorough review of the evidence, including identifying weaknesses in police documentation.

Why Detailed Legal Review Can Change the Outcome

Many DUI cases are decided based on details that may seem minor at first glance. A missing observation, an unclear timeline, or a contradiction can shift the direction of a case.

Police notes are not perfect. They are written by individuals under pressure and can contain errors. A detailed legal review ensures that these weaknesses are identified and used effectively.

A strong DUI defence focuses on precision. It challenges assumptions, tests credibility, and ensures that the evidence meets the required legal standard.

FAQs about Police Observation Notes and DUI Defence

Are police notes always reliable in DUI cases?

No. While they are important, police notes can contain errors, omissions, or inconsistencies that affect their reliability.

Can DUI charges be dropped due to mistakes in police notes?

Yes. If the mistakes undermine credibility or reveal legal violations, charges may be reduced or dismissed.

Do courts in Calgary rely heavily on officer observations?

Courts consider them important but require consistency and supporting evidence to rely on them fully.

What if the officer’s notes conflict with video evidence?

Video evidence can challenge the accuracy of the notes and weaken the prosecution’s case.

Should I request police notes immediately after being charged?

Yes, but this is typically done through your lawyer as part of the disclosure process.

Payroll and Employment Fraud Allegations in Calgary

Khalid Akram · March 27, 2026 ·

Key Takeaways

Payroll and employment fraud involves deception related to wages, benefits, or employment records
Both employees and employers can face criminal charges
Charges may include fraud, theft, forgery, or breach of trust
The Crown must prove intent to defraud, not just an error
Penalties depend on whether fraud is under or over $5,000
Early advice from a fraud lawyer in Calgary can influence the outcome significantly

What Is Payroll and Employment Fraud in Canada?

Payroll fraud refers to dishonest actions that manipulate employee compensation or employment records for financial gain. These cases often involve internal systems and trusted roles, which makes them complex.

Common examples include:

Inflating hours or submitting false overtime claims
Adding “ghost employees” to payroll systems
Misclassifying employees as contractors to avoid deductions
Submitting unauthorized bonuses or expense reimbursements

Not every workplace issue leads to criminal liability. There is a clear distinction between civil misconduct and criminal fraud. The key factor is intent.

To secure a conviction, the Crown must show that the accused knowingly engaged in deception. A simple mistake, accounting error, or misunderstanding does not automatically amount to fraud. This distinction often becomes the central issue in a defence strategy.

Types of Payroll and Employment Fraud Charges in Calgary

Payroll-related allegations can trigger several criminal charges depending on the facts.

Common charges include:

Fraud under $5,000
Fraud over $5,000
Theft by employee
Forgery and falsification of documents
Breach of trust by employee or employer

Each charge has different legal thresholds and consequences. For example, fraud over $5,000 is treated as a more serious indictable offence, often carrying higher penalties.

In Calgary, investigations may involve cooperation between employers, forensic accountants, and law enforcement. What begins as an internal workplace issue can quickly escalate into a criminal matter if financial discrepancies are identified.

How Payroll Fraud Investigations Begin

Most payroll fraud cases do not start with police involvement. They typically begin internally.

Common triggers include:

Routine audits uncovering inconsistencies
Reports from whistleblowers or co-workers
Financial irregularities flagged by accounting systems
Reviews conducted by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)

Modern workplaces rely heavily on digital systems. As a result, investigations often involve:

Payroll software activity logs
Email records and internal communications
Access histories and approval workflows

Employers may initially conduct their own investigation. If they believe fraud occurred, they may refer the matter to police. At that point, the situation shifts from a workplace dispute to a criminal case.

Key Legal Elements the Crown Must Prove

To secure a conviction for fraud, the Crown must prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

These include:

The fraudulent act (actus reus)
The intent to deceive (mens rea)
A financial loss or risk of loss

Intent is often the most contested element. In employment settings, financial discrepancies can arise from:

Miscommunication
Poor training
Administrative errors

A strong fraud defence lawyer will examine whether the evidence truly supports deliberate deception. If intent cannot be proven, the case may weaken significantly.

Penalties for Payroll and Employment Fraud in Canada

Penalties vary depending on the value of the alleged fraud and the circumstances of the case.

For fraud under $5,000:

May proceed as a summary or hybrid offence
Possible penalties include fines, probation, or short-term custody

For fraud over $5,000:

Typically treated as an indictable offence
Potential for significant fines and longer custodial sentences

Additional consequences may include:

Restitution orders requiring repayment
Loss of professional licences
Damage to employment prospects and reputation

For non-citizens, a conviction may also affect immigration status, including admissibility to Canada.

Common Defence Strategies Used by a Fraud Defence Lawyer

Every case is unique, but several defence strategies frequently arise in payroll fraud cases.

These include:

Lack of Intent

If the actions were accidental or based on misunderstanding, the required intent may be absent.

Insufficient Evidence

The Crown must rely on accurate financial records. Errors in audits or incomplete documentation can undermine the case.

Procedural Errors

If investigators fail to follow proper procedures, the defence may challenge the reliability of evidence.

Charter Violations

Unlawful searches or seizures may lead to evidence being excluded under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Disputing Financial Calculations

Fraud allegations often depend on complex accounting. A defence may challenge how losses were calculated.

An experienced fraud lawyer in Calgary will tailor the defence based on the specific facts and evidence.

Employer vs Employee Liability in Fraud Cases

Liability depends on who controlled the actions and who benefited from them.

Employee Liability

Employees may face charges when they:

Manipulate payroll systems
Submit false claims
Abuse positions of trust

Employer or Corporate Liability

Employers may be implicated when:

Fraud is systemic or encouraged
Internal controls are knowingly ignored
Senior management is involved

In some cases, both individuals and corporations may face consequences. Determining responsibility requires a detailed review of roles, authority, and decision-making processes.

What to Do If You Are Accused of Payroll Fraud in Calgary

If you are accused, your response in the early stages can affect the entire case.

Take these steps immediately:

Do not provide statements without legal advice
Preserve all emails, documents, and records
Avoid discussing the matter with colleagues or investigators
Do not attempt to alter or delete records

Many individuals believe they can “explain” the situation. However, statements made early can later be used as evidence. Consulting a fraud defence lawyer before responding is critical.

How a Calgary Fraud Defence Lawyer Can Help

A knowledgeable fraud lawyer in Calgary plays a central role in protecting your rights.

They can:

Assess the strength of the case early
Review disclosure and financial evidence
Identify inconsistencies or weaknesses
Challenge improper investigative methods
Negotiate with prosecutors when appropriate
Represent you in court if necessary

Early legal involvement often leads to better outcomes. In some cases, charges may be reduced or resolved without trial.

FAQs

What is considered payroll fraud in Canada?

Payroll fraud involves intentional deception related to wages, benefits, or employment records. Examples include false overtime claims and ghost employees.

Can payroll errors lead to criminal charges?

Not always. Errors or negligence do not automatically result in criminal liability. The Crown must prove intent to defraud.

What is the penalty for employment fraud over $5,000?

Penalties can include significant fines, restitution, and possible jail time. The outcome depends on the facts and prior record.

Can an employer be charged with fraud?

Yes. Employers may face charges if they participate in or allow fraudulent practices within the organization.

How can a fraud defence lawyer help reduce charges?

A lawyer may challenge evidence, dispute intent, and negotiate with prosecutors to seek reduced or withdrawn charges.

Fraud Under $5,000 vs Over $5,000: Key Legal Differences

Khalid Akram · March 23, 2026 ·

Key Takeaways

Fraud under $5,000 is a hybrid offence and may proceed by summary conviction or indictment
Fraud over $5,000 is an indictable offence with significantly harsher penalties
Both offences require proof of dishonesty and deprivation under the Criminal Code of Canada
Sentencing depends on factors like intent, financial impact, and prior record
A fraud defence lawyer can challenge evidence, intent, and procedural issues
Convictions can result in a criminal record, affecting employment and travel

What Is Fraud Under Canadian Law?

Under the Criminal Code of Canada, fraud occurs when a person uses dishonesty, falsehood, or deceit to deprive another of money, property, or valuable security. The offence does not require actual loss. A risk of loss is often enough.

To prove fraud, the Crown must establish two key elements. First, there must be a dishonest act, such as misrepresentation or concealment. Second, there must be deprivation or risk of deprivation affecting the victim.

Common examples include credit card fraud, insurance fraud, and identity-related financial deception. In many cases, the issue is not just what happened, but whether the accused had the intent to defraud. This element often becomes central in a defence strategy.

Fraud Under $5,000 – Charges and Legal Classification

Fraud under $5,000 is classified as a hybrid offence. This means the Crown can choose to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment, depending on the seriousness of the case.

Summary conviction cases are typically less severe. They often involve lower financial amounts, minimal planning, or isolated incidents. Indictable proceedings, however, may be used if there are aggravating factors.

Examples of fraud under $5,000 include small-scale online marketplace scams, minor expense misrepresentation, or low-value financial deception. Despite the lower amount, the charge remains serious.

A conviction can still lead to jail time, probation, fines, and restitution orders. It also creates a criminal record, which can have lasting consequences.

Fraud Over $5,000 – More Serious Criminal Consequences

Fraud over $5,000 is treated as a more serious offence and is typically prosecuted as an indictable offence. This reflects the greater financial harm and often more complex nature of the conduct.

Cases in this category often involve larger schemes, multiple victims, or extended periods of deception. Examples include investment fraud, corporate fraud, and large-scale financial scams.

Because of the higher stakes, these cases receive increased attention from law enforcement. The Crown is more likely to pursue custodial sentences, especially where there is evidence of planning or abuse of trust.

The legal process is also more involved. Accused individuals may face preliminary inquiries, longer trials, and more detailed evidence review.

Key Legal Differences between Fraud Under and Over $5,000

The distinction between fraud under $5,000 and fraud over $5,000 affects nearly every stage of a criminal case.

The most important difference is severity. Fraud over $5,000 carries higher penalties and is treated as inherently more serious. Fraud under $5,000 offers more flexibility in how the Crown proceeds.

The court process also differs. Summary conviction matters are resolved more quickly and in lower courts. Indictable offences may involve more complex procedures and longer timelines.

There are also differences in sentencing exposure. Fraud under $5,000 has lower maximum penalties. Fraud over $5,000 carries a maximum of up to 14 years in prison.

Finally, the Crown’s prosecution strategy changes. Higher-value fraud cases often involve more aggressive litigation and detailed financial analysis.

Penalties and Sentencing in Calgary Fraud Cases

Penalties for fraud depend on the amount involved and the surrounding circumstances.

For fraud under $5,000, sentencing may include:

Jail time of up to 2 years less a day (if prosecuted summarily)
Probation orders with strict conditions
Fines and restitution to compensate victims

For fraud over $5,000, penalties are significantly more severe:

Maximum sentence of up to 14 years imprisonment
Greater likelihood of custodial sentences
Higher restitution amounts and long-term financial obligations

Courts also consider aggravating factors, such as:

Abuse of a position of trust
Multiple victims or repeated conduct
Significant financial or emotional harm

Mitigating factors, including lack of prior record or early restitution, can influence the outcome.

Long-Term Consequences of a Fraud Conviction

A conviction for fraud can affect multiple areas of life long after the case ends.

A criminal record can limit job opportunities, especially in finance, law, or positions requiring trust. Employers often conduct background checks, and fraud-related offences raise serious concerns.

Travel can also become difficult. Certain countries may deny entry to individuals with fraud convictions. Immigration status may also be affected in some cases.

There are also financial consequences, including restitution orders and fines. These obligations can create long-term financial strain.

Reputation damage is another key issue. Fraud charges often carry a stigma that can impact personal and professional relationships.

How a Fraud Defence Lawyer Builds Your Case

A skilled fraud defence lawyer focuses on identifying weaknesses in the Crown’s case and building a strong defence strategy.

The process begins with a detailed review of disclosure, including financial records, witness statements, and investigative reports. This helps identify inconsistencies or gaps in evidence.

One of the most effective approaches is challenging intent. If the Crown cannot prove deliberate dishonesty, the case may weaken significantly.

A lawyer may also examine whether there were procedural errors or Charter violations, such as unlawful search or improper questioning.

Negotiation is another key component. In some cases, a fraud lawyer can work with the Crown to reduce charges or seek alternative resolutions.

Each case requires a tailored strategy based on the facts, evidence, and legal risks involved.

Defence Strategies for Fraud Charges

Several defence strategies may apply in fraud cases, depending on the circumstances.

A common defence is lack of intent. If the accused believed their actions were legitimate, this can challenge the foundation of the charge.

Another approach is demonstrating an honest mistake or misunderstanding. Not all financial discrepancies amount to criminal conduct.

In some cases, the defence may argue insufficient evidence. The Crown must prove each element of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mistaken identity can also arise, particularly in cases involving online transactions or multiple parties.

Finally, Charter violations may lead to the exclusion of key evidence. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

When to Contact a Fraud Lawyer in Calgary

Timing is critical in fraud cases. Speaking to a fraud defence lawyer early can protect your rights and improve your legal position.

You should seek legal advice immediately after being charged or if you are under investigation. Early intervention allows your lawyer to guide you before mistakes are made.

It is especially important to consult a lawyer before speaking to police. Statements made without legal advice can be used as evidence.

Legal support is also essential during bail hearings, disclosure review, and pre-trial negotiations. Each stage presents opportunities to strengthen your defence.

FAQs

What is the main difference between fraud under and over $5,000?

The key difference is the amount involved. Fraud over $5,000 is treated more seriously and carries harsher penalties, including longer prison sentences.

Can fraud under $5,000 result in jail time?

Yes. Even though it is considered less serious, jail time is still possible, especially if there are aggravating factors.

Is fraud over $5,000 always an indictable offence?

In most cases, yes. It is generally prosecuted as an indictable offence due to the higher financial impact.

Can fraud charges be reduced or withdrawn?

Yes. Charges may be reduced or withdrawn if there is weak evidence, legal issues, or successful negotiation by a lawyer.

Do both types of fraud lead to a criminal record?

Yes. A conviction for either offence typically results in a criminal record, unless the case is resolved favourably.

How can a fraud lawyer help my case?

A fraud lawyer can assess evidence, challenge the Crown’s case, negotiate outcomes, and represent you in court.

👉 Call (403) 774-9529 to speak with Khalid Akram.